All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court on the Defendant’s grounds of appeal, the lower court’s determination that the modified facts charged (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal) were guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning is justifiable.

There is no error exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

2. Examining the Prosecutor’s grounds of appeal, the lower court is justifiable to have determined the Defendant not guilty on the grounds that there was no proof of crime as to the crime committed habitually and habitually and habitually and habitually and unlawfully threatening the Victim E among the facts charged in the instant case, which were modified, No. 1 through No. 4 of the first instance judgment regarding the Victim G, based on the reasons indicated in its reasoning.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal doctrine.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.