The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Each of the crimes of this case in question is causing property damage and bodily injury to the surviving victim, and the nature of the crime is not good. However, the defendant's argument is justified since the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable because it is too too unreasonable, considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument is justified.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is with merit.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the evidence admitted by the court is the same as the corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury to a lineal ascendant and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the long-term punishments for the crimes of the two crimes);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;