logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.28 2013가합64866
하자보수에 갈음하는 손해배상 등
Text

1. The following 2-A among the lawsuits against Defendant Two Industrial Construction Co., Ltd.

part exceeding the money set forth in subsection (1).

Reasons

Basic Facts

1) The Plaintiff is the party to the instant apartment complex in Ansan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment complex”).

(2) The defendant association is an executor who constructed and sold the apartment of this case.

3) The Defendant Association contracted the construction of the instant apartment to the Defendant 2san Construction, and the Defendant 2san Construction performed the new construction of the instant apartment. 4) The Defendant 2san Housing Guarantee guaranteed the defect repair obligation regarding the instant apartment of the Defendant 2san Construction.

1) The contract for the warranty of defects is concluded between Defendant 2 and Defendant 2. The warranty contract for the warranty of defects (hereinafter “instant warranty contract”) around September 10, 2010 between Defendant 2 and Defendant 2’s house guarantee.

A) Upon concluding a contract for the repair of defects from the Defendant’s housing guarantee to the Ansan City Mayor, which is the authority for usage of the following [Attachment 1], the guarantee creditor was determined to be changed to the relevant council of occupants’ representatives or the management body, if the council of occupants’ representatives or the management body is formed while concluding the instant contract for the repair of defects. [Attachment 1] From September 30, 201 to September 29, 201, the guarantee number guarantee period of 1D and other 269, 7481 to 2 E-1, 209, 2010 to 30.4, 269, 269, 748 from September 30 to September 29, 2012 to 30, 205, 205 to 30, 205, 29, 3F48 from September 30, 2013 to 30, 2014 to 305, 2934.

arrow