beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 3,00,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "D" on the first floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C.
On February 24, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 130,00 from E at the said sexual traffic business establishment on February 24, 2015, and arranged to engage in similar sexual intercourse with F, a female sexual traffic in the said business establishment, as seen above, from the end of December 2014 to February 24, 2015.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each statement of E and F;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph and investigative report (the calculation of an additional collection charge);
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Selection of an alternative sentence of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;
1. The basic area (referring to six months to four months) of the sentencing criteria [the range of recommendations] the basic area (referring to the mediation, etc. of commercial sex acts due to the receipt, delivery, etc. of business prices) of the types of the crimes subject to 19 years of age or older;
2. Recognizing that the Defendant had a record of being sentenced to a fine of two million won on November 29, 2013 due to a violation of the Medical Service Act on November 29, 2013 by operating a place without qualification at the same place, and rendering a judgment as ordered for the same reason.