logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.23 2017고정866
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 4, 2016, the Defendant is carrying out various countermeasures prepared in the Internet SNS bulletin board, which was operated by using a cell phone in G coffee shop near the F Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, with the ID of 'A'.

There are many time and money, but in some years, the responsibility for mobilization of all criminal, civil, and several things.

Among them, there is also a person who was the husband of the husband.

일주일에 몇 번 씩이나 남편의 사무실을 들락거리며 남편에게 제가 진행하고 있는 소송에 대한 여러 가지 얘기를 들으면서도, 남편에게 5억이 넘는 물품대금을 지급하지 않고 계획적인 파산으로 책임을 회피하고 당당하게 H 재판을 따라 다니고 있는 I과 함께, H에게 먼저 연락을 해서 친분을 유지하고 있단 사실을 감쪽같이 숨기고 있다가 저희 쪽에서 그걸 알게 되어 사실 여부에 대해 물으니 사과는커녕, H로부터 알게 되면 깜짝 놀랄 사람이 나를 도와주고 있다는 말을 들었다, 내가 생각할 땐 너의 직원이 의심스러우니 직원을 의심해 보라며 부추긴 인간입니다.

In that sense, it has made the same account as the mother and child photograph, and spreads the author and her husband with slandering and false facts to the third party, and receives the written complaint in suspicion of false suspicion.

I will not interfere with any unlawful act by any person.

I may not refuse to do so, as well as you may do.

As such, it seems that the investigation agency or the court would not infinitely avoid one’s words, and it is expected that A refuses to do so, and that I will show infinitely infinites.

“The victim I posted a notice to the effect that the victim I was indemnified by filing a petition for bankruptcy on a planned basis to avoid the Defendant’s debt owed to the Defendant’s husband.”

However, the husband of the defendant.

arrow