beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On October 17, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on June 29, 2012, the Seoul East District Court issued a summary order of a fine of five million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), respectively. On July 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seoul District Court.
On March 8, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.106% during blood transfusion around 10:25, the Defendant driven a BM5 car from the front of the new spring restaurant located in the Yongsan-dong in the Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Gowon-dong to the front road of the apartment site up to approximately 200 meters.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Response to a request for appraisal;
1. Previous convictions: Application of a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, one copy of output of the personal confinement status, three copies of the previous convictions, three copies of the previous convictions, three copies of the judgment of drinking driving, and three copies of the summary order;
1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the Defendant was repenting and reflecting his mistake in depth, and that there are some circumstances to consider the motive and background leading to the instant crime, as well as the means and consequence of the instant crime, comprehensively taking into account various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, and criminal record and criminal record relation.