beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Fact-finding;
A. This court opened the date of distribution on January 23, 2017, in the case of the auction of the C real estate rent, which was commenced with respect to D farm site No. 1713 square meters and buildings, etc. on its ground (owner) in Pakistan-si, and distributes the amount of KRW 9 million out of KRW 713,833,731, the actual amount to be distributed to the defendant who is in the position of the largest wage creditor in the first priority order, and distributes the amount of distribution to the defendant who is in the position of the largest wage creditor in the second priority order in the second order in the second and third order in the second order in the second order in the second order in the second order in the second order in the second order in the second order in the second order, the amount of KRW 767,210 and KRW 279,523,589 to the plaintiff and the defendant, who is the wage creditor, within the fourth order in the second order in which the plaintiff raised the total amount of distribution to the defendant, and the amount of KRW 16301,1970.
B. In the above auction procedure, on March 15, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for the demand for distribution with this court on the basis of the original copy of the decision of recommending reconciliation with the executory power over wage cases, and sought the distribution of the principal amount of KRW 22 million and damages for delay KRW 3,480,000,000 against the debtor E based on the original copy of the decision of recommending reconciliation with the power over
In the case of a claim for wages on which the decision to recommend reconciliation was based, the Defendant asserted that “F was unable to receive the remainder after receiving payment of KRW 24 million, which is part of the total annual paid leave allowances of KRW 24,918,656, which is 24,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000 won, from the two weeks of both States, while operating the H Care Board in G (hereinafter “the instant medical care Board”) around September 2013, and leasing the medical care center to I and E., and the Defendant was working from the medical care center actually operated by I and E to May 31, 2014.”
C. On September 29, 2005, J shall grant E the maximum debt amount with respect to the real estate at auction.