The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of suspended execution in August, and forty hours of order to attend school) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant had been punished as a violation of the Road Traffic Act due to drinking and unlicensed driving, and a violation of the Act on the Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Defendant’s conviction of blood alcohol content without a driver’s license is a condition for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, which led to the instant crime, even though it had been committed several times from 1995 to 201.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed a mistake in depth and again, the Defendant did not commit such a crime; (b) the Defendant did not have been sentenced to imprisonment and agreed with the victim; and (c) the Defendant’s family members want to have the highest place of the Defendant’s wife; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, and circumstances after committing the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed to be unreasonable and unreasonable.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.