The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below shows the attitude of recognizing and opposing the defendant's wrong, while considering the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the fact that D, in the name of the person subject to the defendant's punishment of this case, expressed his intention not to punish the defendant, and there was no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, in light of the method and result of the crime, and that there is no substantial recovery from economic damage caused by the crime of this case until the trial is in the first instance, there is no change of circumstances that could reduce the sentence of the court below at the trial, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and changes theory, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, method and consequence of the crime, etc., after considering the punishment of the court below, the sentence of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it is not unfair because it is excessively unreasonable.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.