1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the B Q335 TDI quiat vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the owner of the Cran vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) to compensate for damages caused by accidents in the course of operation.

B. On April 14, 2016, around 01:45, the Plaintiff was an accident in which the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle shocked the Plaintiff’s vehicle to left the left while going to the left at the normal distance of the Ulsan-gu Culture and Arts Center (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle has been considerably damaged by the Hydd, Furging (Liart), Roft Panel, Furging Panel, Furg wheeling, Rurging (Aurging), and members of Furging, etc., and the repair company that repaired the Plaintiff’s vehicle issued a written claim demanding KRW 44,589,331 at its repair cost.

From October 26, 2016 to June 2, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 53,914,000 in total to the Plaintiff, including the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the cost of lowering the market price (hereinafter “satise damage”) due to the instant accident, and the Plaintiff’s cost of using sirens.

E. Meanwhile, the Defendant filed an application for deliberation on the ratio of negligence of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s vehicle against Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., which concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff on the instant accident to the “Committee for Deliberation on the Settlement of Automobile Insurance Claim”. On October 24, 2016, the said Deliberation Committee decided on October 24, 2016 that the ratio of negligence of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s vehicle to the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s vehicle is 10

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 3, 4, Eul evidence 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion caused the Plaintiff’s loss of KRW 15,980,00 in the market price of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident, and the Defendant committed the instant accident among the said amount to the Plaintiff.