The defendant shall be innocent.

The Defendant is engaged in driving a CCA110V motorcycle.

On February 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the above motorcycle around 14:10 on February 13, 2015, and driven the front road of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building along the four-lane distance from the south side of the side of the terminal.

The driver of any motor vehicle shall live well before and after the driver of any other motor vehicle, while accurately operating the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, and shall not drive any motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that may cause any danger and injury to other persons according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the victim E ( South and 31 years of age) coming from the dead vehicle company due to the negligence of neglecting the front city, and did not discover the road due to the negligence, and suffered the victim's injury, such as the removal of the closed head, bones, etc. requiring about five weeks of treatment.

Judgment

According to the records of this case ( particularly CCTV video images), the following facts are recognized.

A. As indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant was driving a motor device bicycle along four lanes on the side of the alternate distance in the south-west terminal, along the four-lane distance.

B. At the time, there were two-lanes and three-lanes in the direction of the defendant driving along, and the four-lanes are in the situation where the defendant runs along the four-lanes at a speed lower than the limited speed.

C. The victim, as a male under 31 years of age, went back from India to the opposite 7th line of way that the defendant passed, without permission, at a rapid speed, and reached between the vehicles located in the said 2 and 3 lanes, and the motor device driven by the defendant has a strong conflict between the rear side of the motor device driven by the defendant.

Accordingly, the victim suffered the same injury as the stated in the facts charged.