1. The part of the plaintiff A's lawsuit that claims agricultural loss compensation and living zone compensation shall be dismissed;

2. The defendant is the plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Approval and Public Notice of Projects - Construction Projects of Military, Fire-Fighting Facilities (D Projects; hereinafter referred to as “instant projects”) - Project Operators E announced by the Ministry of National Defense on April 25, 2017 - Project Operators E: Defendant

B. The Gangwon-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”) dated October 13, 2017 - Land and obstacles (hereinafter “coverage”) owned by each of the Plaintiffs listed in the relevant items in the separate sheet as indicated in the separate sheet - Compensation for losses (hereinafter “coverage”) - The separate sheet as indicated in the separate sheet : The “amount of adjudication of expropriation” is as indicated in the corresponding sheet.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on November 14, 2017 - An appraisal corporation: F, G, and H et al.: The appraisal of the case is "an appraisal of expropriation".

A person shall be appointed.

C. Results of appraiser I’s appraisal (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - Contents of appraisal: The “court appraisal” as stated in the separate sheet is as stated respectively.

The appraisal report submitted to this court on March 12, 2018 (as a result of the appraisal by appraiser I) states that the amount of stonemarks (as 7.39 of the above appraisal report) among the obstacles owned by Plaintiff A is KRW 20,000,000. However, according to the inquiry reply (as a result of the inquiry by appraiser I) on April 16, 2018, the above KRW 20,000 is a clerical error in the amount of KRW 20,000,000,000,000 from KRW 168,086,130 on the above appraisal report, and KRW 16,26,130 on the portion owned by Plaintiff A is the amount of KRW 168,26,130 on the appraisal report.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence 1 through 5, Eul's evidence 1 (including paper numbers), appraiser I's appraisal result, appraiser I's inquiry result about appraiser I, the whole purport of the pleading, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The Plaintiff A’s judgment on the part of the Plaintiff’s lawsuit regarding the amount of agricultural loss compensation and the claim for living zone compensation against the Defendant (i) was unable to continue agriculture that had been engaged in on the land outside J and seven parcels of land in Samyang-si, and (ii) sought compensation for agricultural loss compensation amounting to KRW 146,281,554, and compensation for delay damages.