(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.02.07 2017고단307

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.02.07 2017고단307

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on July 15, 2016, and on July 23, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 23, 2016, and is currently under suspended sentence of 17 times.

On June 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the “D” entertainment drinking point operated by the victim C, which was located at Sinsi-si B, early 23:00, issued an order from the injured party to pay for alcohol and alcohol even if the injured party did not have the intent or ability to pay it; (b) as if the injured party would pay the normal drinking value, the Defendant issued an order from the injured party and female Dob; and (c) then, the Defendant acquired the order by receiving from the injured party the sum of KRW 2,30,00,000, such as KRW 150,000,000, KRW 10,000, female Dob, etc., and KRW

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement to be prepared;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., such as the fact that the defendant had the same criminal record for the reason of sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that the crime of this case was committed again without being aware of during the period of probation, the fact that the amount of fraud is not big, the fact that the victim has repaid the damage, and that the victim has agreed smoothly with

참조조문

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조 제1항

-형법 제347조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.21 2015고단4074

-부산지방법원 2018.08.24 2018고정921

-서울북부지방법원 2018.09.13 2018고단2039

-부산지방법원 2017.12.11 2017고단731

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.05.10 2017고단1829