1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below is revoked, and that part is revoked.

1. The reasoning in this part of the judgment concerning the basic facts and the cause of the claim is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Section 4 of the judgment of the first instance court, "No. 4,7, and 8 of the content" of the contract for operation and management of the D department store and performance of obligations, "A" by the defendant "A", "A", "I", "A," and "I," respectively, is adjusted.

2. The reasoning for the judgment on the defendant's defense, etc. is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the judgment as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added to the first activity at the bottom of the 7th judgment of the first instance.

【The Defendant asserts that the amount should be deducted inasmuch as the sales amount generated by November 2017 is not included in the amount of debt specified in the instant secondary operation contract, the amount of KRW 15 million out of the sales amount generated by November 2017 shall be paid to the Plaintiff.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 13 and 14, it is recognized that the Defendant paid each of the Plaintiff KRW 10 million on January 5, 2018 and KRW 5 million on March 28, 2018.

If so, the above 15 million won should be deducted from the defendant's obligation, so this part of the defendant's argument is with merit.

In the judgment of the court of first instance, 8 pages 1 to 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance was conducted as follows.

【 Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 212,615,494 won ( = 267,808,774 won - 40,193,280 won - 15,000,000 won) and damages for delay.

The following shall be added to the 8th judgment of the first instance. 14th judgment.

【Defendant asserts that regarding “G point”, the claim for the fee incurred from July 2017 to January 2018 is offset against its equal amount by the automatic claim.

In the instant case, the 2nd of this case.