The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal explicitly withdrawn the assertion of mistake of facts on the date of the first instance trial.

The punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment, 80 hours of order to complete a program, 5 years of order to disclose and notify the defendant) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is committed against the defendant, even though the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for more than six months due to the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Rape, etc.), and committed the crime of this case under the same veterinary method despite the fact that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for more than six months on November 19, 2010, inasmuch as the crime of this case was committed, it is very poor that the nature of the crime was committed. The victim appears to have caused considerable mental impulse and sexual humiliation due to the crime of this case. The defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim up to the time of the trial, and the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim, and the defendant committed the crime of this case under the same veterinary method.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant is against the recognition of the crime of this case and the defendant is also a disabled person of class 3 of intellectual disability, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 1년 6월 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 [유형의 결정] 성범죄군, 일반적기준, 장애인(13세 이상) 대상 성범죄, 제2유형(의제간음/강제추행) [특별양형요소] 없음 [권고영역 및 권고형의 범위] 기본영역, 징역 2년 6월 ~ 5년 , 제1심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제1심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점 대법원...