(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.01.17 2016고정301

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.01.17 2016고정301

무고

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) smoked marijuana at the office of the 1nd police station C Team of the 1nd police station of the 1nd police station of the 2015 Won-si; and (b) on the police officer D assistant working for the Defendant, the Defendant smoked marijuana in the vicinity of the first police station of the 2013nd police officer. In particular, on December 2, 2015, the Defendant smoked marijuana in the vicinity of the first police officer of the 2013nd police officer.

“A false report was made.”

However, in fact, E did not have smoked marijuana since 2013, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that there was no information to determine whether E smoked marijuana after 2013, and thus, the Defendant’s report was false.

As a result, the defendant reported false facts to public officials for the purpose of having them receive criminal punishment.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the Defendant was highly likely to have heard and reported from E that he/she smoked in marijuana.

1. E does not appear as a witness in this court to the effect that “I have never smoked marijuana in the United States and Korea, and that I have not told the Defendant that he smoked marijuana.”

In addition, after returning to the Republic of Korea in 2013, there is no fact that the F (G), and the fact that he has smoked the hemp and has been detained.

“The statement was made”.

However, E has been smoking in the United States of America for three to four times.

on October 30, 2014, which was found in the original prison and was detained as a drug crime in that place.

There is a fact that the F has interviewed.

Considering these points, E’s statements in this Court are difficult to believe as they are.

(2) In the case of a narcotics crime, the drug examination of the suspect's body shall be conducted in the course of investigation, and the prescription of narcotics shall be confirmed immediately.

Any person who has been punished as a violation of the mariana Control Act in 197.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 2018.05.18 2017노119

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.09.24 2019고정69

-서울행정법원 2019.04.24 2019구단54965

-인천지방법원 2020.06.18 2019노2600

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.01.07 2019고합257