beta
Text
1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff each real estate listed in the separate sheet.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.
Reasons
In fact, the F, G, and H’s sales contract, H’s F, G’s lawsuit against G, and G were concluded on July 9, 2010 with H on the attached list Nos. 1-4 (hereinafter “401-404”) and the attached list Nos. 5-7 (hereinafter “501-503”) indicated on G’s list.
H On March 24, 2011, the Suwon District Court rendered a provisional attachment order for the instant commercial building (hereinafter referred to as “instant commercial building”) with No. 401-404, 501-503 (hereinafter referred to as “No. 401-404, 501-503”) and filed a lawsuit against F and G seeking the return of the down payment by asserting that the said sales contract was revoked or revoked by the Seoul Central District Court 201Kahap28514.
F, G and I’s exchange contract with F, G and I transferred the ownership of the instant commercial building to F and G on April 26, 2012, and I entered into an exchange contract with F and G to transfer the ownership of the instant commercial building to F and G in Busan CityJ.
I and Defendant E entered into an exchange contract (hereinafter “instant exchange contract”) with the following terms and conditions (hereinafter “instant exchange contract”) around November 6, 2012:
I: (a) where the ownership of subparagraph 401-404 is transferred to Defendant E; (b) the ownership of subparagraph 501-503 is transferred to L; and (c) the transfer of the ownership of the instant shopping district is not carried out smoothly; (b) the method of compensation shall be 352,880 square meters of forest and fields (hereinafter referred to as “land before division”); and (c) some 35,259 square meters of forest and fields (hereinafter referred to as “land before division”); (d) the value per square meter shall be 1.50,000 square meters of land before division; and (e) the value per square meter shall be 1.50,000 won of the total amount of loans granted by Defendant E, by setting up a collateral security on the land before division; and (e) the ownership of the ownership of 35,259 square meters of the land before subdivision owned by Defendant E, which was transferred to Defendant E.