1. The claim that the Plaintiff A added to this court, changed in exchange, and selected by the Plaintiff Company A.

1. Facts presumed 【Evidence’ without any dispute, described in Gap’s 1 through 6, 26, 27, and Eul’s 5 (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply), the appraisal result of the Korea Copyright Commission’s appraisal, the inquiry of the chairperson of the Korea Copyright Commission of this Court, and the purport of the entire pleadings;

A. 1) The Plaintiff A (mutual name before the change: F) is a company that operates real-time G telephone counseling services, etc. to enable consumers to provide 1:1 telephone counseling with experts or calendars, and Plaintiff B is the representative director of Plaintiff A. 2) Defendant C is a person who was in charge of the development of the program in Plaintiff A, Defendant E is a company that is engaged in telephone information service, etc., Defendant E is a company that is engaged in telephone information service, etc., and Defendant D is a director of Defendant E.

B. From the end of 2000, Plaintiff C commenced the Plaintiff’s program development 1:1 counseling service in 200, Plaintiff A provided He with marketing related to telephone counseling and dialogue with H, and was provided with H with such services as the development of counseling program, system investment, installation of exclusive lines, operation and management. At first, Defendant C provided the above services free of charge from H, and thereafter paid KRW 3 million per month to H as system management expenses. (2) Defendant C completed the program copyright registration (registration number: K) with respect to the computer program, which is a content of the ITRS-based original music real-time transmission program (AG) operated with the core group of ARS Gu engine (hereinafter “instant program”).

3) around December 2001, Plaintiff A, upon the recommendation of Defendant D, who is the director of Defendant E, employed Defendant C as the person in charge of the program development department, and had the former system developed the system that had been provided by H. A. Defendant C, the core part of the “J” it registered as copyright, as seen above.