1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part of the claim for the application cost of provisional attachment, stamp and delivery fee, and attorney’s fee shall be dismissed, respectively.

Facts of recognition

On August 27, 2015, the Plaintiff leased the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from the Defendant to October 21, 2017, the term of the contract was from October 21, 2015 to October 21, 2017, the deposit was KRW 320,000,000 (hereinafter “instant lease deposit”), and the monthly rent was KRW 300,000.

On August 11, 2017, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a letter stating that it would raise the monthly rent of KRW 450,000, and that the Plaintiff decided to be a director on August 13, 2017.

On October 21, 2017, the date of termination of the lease contract, the Plaintiff filed an application for the order of lease registration on October 23, 2017, without notifying the Defendant of the present number of the apartment of this case, who did not return the lease deposit of this case. On October 27, 2017, the Plaintiff completed the lease registration on December 1, 2017 upon receiving the order of lease registration (Seoul Northern Northern District Court 2017Kadan1075) with respect to the apartment of this case.

On November 7, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for provisional seizure against the instant apartment as Seoul Northern District Court 2017Kadan22633 on November 13, 2017, with respect to the instant apartment as the claim for the refund of the lease deposit, and the provisional seizure was registered on November 13, 2017.

On November 16, 2017, the Plaintiff sent a text message informing the Defendant that the present official password was cancelled and the present official password was cancelled.

The Defendant returned the lease deposit to the Plaintiff by paying the Plaintiff KRW 43,00,000,00 on December 13, 2017, KRW 91,00,000 on December 14, 2017, KRW 44,00,000 on December 27, 2017, KRW 20,000 on December 29, 2017, and KRW 22,000,000 on January 2, 2018.

[Reasons for recognition] The above part of the claim for damages equivalent to interest on the ground of the entire argument and the purport of the claim as to Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 7 through 10, 18, and 20.