1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) if the plaintiff does not revoke the Class I large, Class I ordinary, and Class I special (large) driver's license for the plaintiff, the plaintiff is able to continue to drive a vehicle that can be operated with the above Class II driver's license for the above Class II driver's license; and (b) the plaintiff's blood alcohol concentration is much more than 0.100%, which is the criteria for the cancellation of driver's license as stipulated in the Road Traffic Act and subordinate statutes, and there is no circumstance to specially reduce the plaintiff, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of 0.139%, which is stated in Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.