The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the lower court sentenced the Defendant (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant is admitted to commit a crime, this case concerns several foreign workers among the victims, as the defendant, who has been engaged in the management of the building, acquired money by deceiving many lessees or forged the lease contract.

Despite the amount obtained by deceit due to this case, the damage was recovered or did not agree with the victims, and when the crime was discovered, it was also locked for one year after escape.

Defendant has been punished for the same crime of fraud.

The judgment below

There is no new circumstance to consider sentencing after sentencing.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings, such as the defendant's age, health, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (as to the costs of lawsuit, the proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply).