A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 6 months for the crimes of Articles 2 through 4 of the judgment, and by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 3 years.

Punishment of the crime

On January 29, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court on October 23, 201, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on October 23, 201. On December 7, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a term of six months in the same court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 21, 2012.

The defendant operated the E-gas station located in Busan-gu D.

[2012 Highest 5870]

1. On August 201, 201, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F by phone call to the E stations, stating that “I believe that there is oil shipped out from the same vice frame as a large enterprise, and that because of the purchase in large quantities from a large enterprise, oil would normally be stored in 20 to 30 won per liter, and if an accident occurs, I would make a false statement that there would be KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won per liter.”

However, the Defendant was unable to pay the amount equivalent to KRW 19 million to G company H that is supplied with diesel, and the Defendant was unable to pay the amount equivalent to KRW 80 million to other business partners. Even if he was supplied with diesel from G company, the Defendant, who was to supply a considerable portion of KRW 121,600,000 to K, was transferred from the victim on September 8, 201, and transferred KRW 140,000 to G company via transfer, but the Defendant supplied KRW 72,00,000 via transfer to the victim, but the victim supplied the remainder of KRW 20,000 and supplied KRW 52,000 to K.

After that, the demand for light oil from the victim continued to exist, the victim supplied 20,000 liters around September 15, 201, and only 40,000 liters initially promised.

Then, even if the victim receives the oil price from the victim, it was not possible to supply the transit properly.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 121,60,000 won from the victim to the corporate bank account in the name of L, as the price for 80,000 liter via around September 8, 201.