The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On June 25, 2015, at around 21:30, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim F (the 22 years of age) working for arbrate at the E main office located in Pyeongtaek-si D, using the gaps in which the Defendant would bring about an empty turb by using the table table with which he is seated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. A fine of three million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. If a conviction of a sex offense subject to the registration of personal information becomes final and conclusive under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the confession of the offense in this case and is divided, the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, the defendant does not have the same criminal record, the degree of indecent act is minor, the degree of exercise of tangible power is considerably weak, and the defendant's age, occupation, etc. are considerably weak) of the suspended sentence, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to the related agency in accordance with Article 43 of the same Act.

Provided, That if it is deemed to be acquitted after two years have elapsed without the invalidation of suspension of sentence after the judgment of suspension of sentence becomes final and conclusive, the person subject to registration shall be exempted from the obligation to submit personal information

(See Supreme Court Decision 2014Do3564 Decided November 13, 2014). The Defendant’s age exempted from disclosure order or notification order, the type, motive, process, seriousness of the instant crime, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s suffering due to disclosure order or notification order, the effectiveness of preventing sexual crimes subject to registration, and the effect of protecting the victim.