The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around 01:00 on July 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven an EK5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.166% at a distance of about 2km from the street before and after the Dolle D Incheon-si, Sincheon-si, to the front and right edge of the EM convenience store.

2. Although there is a F’s written statement that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case, in light of the fact that the F stated on July 30, 2012 that “the fact that the F has been mixed driving is not accurate,” it is difficult to believe this. The witness G and H’s each legal statement, and the F’s police statement are merely those that the Defendant could not drive, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered under the latter part of Article 325 of the