1. The Defendant’s KRW 51,260,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from July 15, 2015 to August 9, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 09:10 on December 3, 2014, the Defendant arrested under a warrant of arrest, who was arrested with a warrant of arrest issued by the Ulsan District Prosecutor’s Office around 23:00 on December 4, 2014, the Defendant requested a warrant of arrest issued by the Ulsan District Prosecutor’s Office around 23:00.

(b)Article 4 (Advanced Remuneration) ① (Defendant) of the conclusion of a delegation contract shall pay 30 million won (value added tax) to B (Plaintiff) at the time of the conclusion of the delegation contract, along with the commencement fee.

On December 3, 2014, received on December 3, 2014

(a) Where the contingent remuneration is successful, the contingent remuneration shall be paid separately in accordance with the following classification:

(8) Other: Additional 30 million won shall be paid when a suspended sentence is sentenced at the time of sentencing after the release on bail, such as a warrant angle, a review of legality, 30 million won at the time of release on bail (excluding value-added tax), and value-added tax shall be additionally paid.

Article 6 (Bearing of Expenses) (3) 300,000 won (excluding value-added tax) per hour shall be paid at the time of entry into an investigation.

1) On December 3, 2014, the Defendant entered into the instant delegation agreement with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant delegation agreement”) with the following terms and conditions.

(2) At the time of the instant delegation contract, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the retainer fee of KRW 33 million (including value-added tax).

C. On December 5, 2014, the Plaintiff issued a detention warrant was present as the Defendant’s defense counsel on the date of examination held on December 10:30, 201, and the Plaintiff testified as to the existence of grounds for detention and its necessity, and circumstances favorable to the Defendant, but at the time, the Defendant denied all the facts of suspicion of offering of bribe and giving of

The Ulsan District Court issued a warrant of detention to the defendant on the same day.

On the other hand, when the Ulsan District Prosecutors' Office examines the case of bribery against the defendant, the plaintiff was present as the defendant's defense counsel for about 22 hours in total as shown below.

On December 3, 2014, 12:00 to 22:0 on December 3, 2014, 7:00 to 10:0 to 18:00 on December 4, 2014.