logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.08.18 2016고정295
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the insured of the “B” from the gallongal gallon before the Dralian personnel wasd.

The Defendant, on March 23, 2016, connected to the Defendant’s house located in Newanan-gun C to the “B” gallon gallon, which was DNA personnel on the Defendant’s house located in Newan-gun C, and connected to the “B” on the bulletin board, “a group start-up fluor,” and she was fluored so as to hold a gallon, and she was fluord by the fluor, and the fluor of the 1030 certificate of contribution. As a result, the Defendant was a strong beam beamed with the fluor of the 100-round 10-round 10-round 10-round 3-round 270-round 15-round 16-round 16-round 16-round 10-round 10-round 106-round 10-round 10-round 3-round 270-round son.

D. D. D. D.

Around 22:36 March 23, 2016, the Plaintiff made a title, “Abrupted D’,” which read, “Abrupt D’s start-up Do Do Do Do Do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do

2. Determination and conclusion

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Offenses subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(c) Submission of a written withdrawal of complaint on June 28, 2016 by the victim;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow