logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.01.09 2019고단4403
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Driving) are those engaged in driving service of JETS 125C JTS Or without any number plate.

On September 19, 2019, at around 0:12:00, the Defendant driven the above Oba while under the influence of alcohol with 0.195% of alcohol concentration, and proceeded along two lanes from the opposite side of the front side of the C, located in Gwangju Northern-gu B, to the flow distance on the third-lane road, and continued along the right-hand white line in order to overtake the front vehicle signal at the intersection.

At the same time, there is a crosswalk in which signal lights are installed, and there is a red light on the signal lights on the front side. Therefore, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as driving slowly to the person engaged in driving on the front side, safe driving in accordance with the new code, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front wheels part of the bicycle driving by the victim E (the 53 years old) who was driving a bicycle from the middle distance to D elementary school at the above intersection due to the negligence of having violated the signal while normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and was driven by the victim E (the 53 years old).

After all, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a cage cage cage cage, etc., from the above victim due to the above occupational negligence in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of the JETS 125c JETS.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the foregoing Oba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place of the charge No. 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E;

arrow