Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:30 on May 16, 2015, the Defendant was working to transfer Gemanium C to the Gemanium in Ansan-si.

At this time, the victim D resisted the victim's ‘drawing with the mind', and the defendant was suffering from an injury, such as the victim's physical part while fighting the victim's body with drinking, and the victim was unable to know the number of days of treatment, and the blue blue with the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant, while fighting as indicated in the facts of the crime in the judgment, inflicted an injury upon the victim in need of medical treatment for about six weeks, such as cutting the upper right frame of the fifth underwater aggregates.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in this part of the judgment, there is a statement corresponding to D’s protocol of suspect interrogation of the police, injury diagnosis statement, and inquiry inquiry inquiry letter about the limit hospital of the Mao Medical Foundation on July 6, 2016.

However, according to the results of the fact-finding inquiry conducted on September 23, 2016 to the limit hospital of the Pacific Medical Foundation, it is recognized that the aggregate of the fifth underwater water from the right side is generated in the case of the price of a single substance that is cut to drinking, and that it is mainly generated in the case of the price of head.

In addition to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, namely, the defendant suffered from the injury that is rapidly cut to the right of the victim at the time (Evidence No. 18 pages) in the course of wrapping with the victim at the time, the sum of the victim's five double water frames to the right of the victim should be taken to the right of the defendant.