The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (two years of suspended execution, probation, 40 hours community service order, 15250,00 won additional collection in six months of imprisonment) is too unfeasible to the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed the act of arranging sexual traffic in this case even though he had been punished twice for the same crime in the past, the Defendant committed the act of arranging sexual traffic in this case, the period of operation of the instant sexual traffic establishment is relatively longer long, and the act of arranging sexual traffic is not much harmful to the society, such as by commercializing women’s sex and impairing sound sexual culture and good morals, etc., the Defendant’s liability is not less than that of the Defendant, but the Defendant’s confessions the instant crime and runs counter to his depth, and the Defendant does not repeat the instant crime; there is no history of punishment exceeding a fine in the past; the Defendant’s motive and background leading up to the instant crime; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., are considered to be too uneasible and unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.