The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, in consultation with the victim in the Busan Young-gu C Apartment Management Office (hereinafter referred to as the "Management Office of this case"), and the victim remains in G and H where he left the Management Office of this case, and he did not directly make the above remarks to the victim, and thus, the victim did not have intention or performance of insult. However, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the fact that the judgment below affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted by the court below, i.e., ① the victim shows the receipt of the provisional disposition of suspension from office from the police office to the court of the court below, and explain it to E at the time of the consistent deliberation from the police office to the court of the court below, ② the defendant stated that he was "I, management officer I, G and H," and that he was "I," and that he was "I, I," and that he was "I, I, I, the resident," and that he was "I, I," the defendant was "I, I, I, and I," and the defendant stated that the defendant was "I, I, I, at the time of the court of the court of the court below's decision, I, but I, at the time of the prosecutor's office of this case, stated that the victim was "I, I, I, I, and I, at the time of the court's decision," and that the victim was "I, at the time of this case's oral statement and statement."