logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2012.07.05 2012고정380
건축법위반
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of KRW 10,00,000, KRW 15,000,000, KRW 15,000,000, KRW 25,00,00, KRW 20,00, KRW 25,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant C and Defendant B are co-owners of a 4-story building of reinforced concrete structure located G at the time of strike with Defendant C and Defendant B’s joint criminal conduct with the F, and F are co-owners of the said building as the representative director of H Co., Ltd.

Any person who intends to make a substantial repair of a building shall obtain permission from the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu and other competent administrative agencies.

Nevertheless, in collusion with F, Defendant C and Defendant B obtained approval for the use of the above 2,3, and 4 floors as one household (each 142.91 square meters), respectively, within the urban planning zone, respectively. On May 2010, Defendant C and Defendant B made a large-scale repair of the above building by expanding 6 of the total number of party walls to the living room of the 2,3, and the 4th floor and the main room of the building without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency.

2. Defendant A’s co-principal with Defendant F is the owner of a four-story building of reinforced concrete structure located in the first place in Pakistan, and F is the construction executor of the said building as the representative director of H Co., Ltd.

Any person who intends to make a substantial repair of a building shall obtain permission from the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu and other competent administrative agencies.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, in collusion with F, obtained approval for the use of the above 2,3, and 4 floors as one household (each 144.88 square meters), respectively, of the above building in the urban planning zone. On July 2010, Defendant A made a large-scale repair by means of expanding the total number of 6 of the party walls to the living room of the 2, 3, and 4th and the main bank of the above building without obtaining permission from the competent administrative agency.

3. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant C and Defendant D

A. Defendant C is the owner of a four-story building of reinforced concrete structure located in JJ at the time of strike, and Defendant D is the contractor of the above building as the K Company representative.

Any person who intends to make a substantial repair of a building shall obtain permission from the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu and other competent administrative agencies.

Nevertheless, Defendant C and Defendant D shall be one household (14.04 square meters, 109.53 square meters, 109.53 square meters, 109.53 square meters, respectively) with the two, three, and four floors of the above building located in an urban planning zone in collusion.

arrow