logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.11.07 2012구합1216
진료계획불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff received medical care and medical care for the injury of this case from the Defendant for occupational accidents that occurred on May 26, 192 while serving as an employee belonging to Sam Chang-gu Co., Ltd., with the approval of the medical care and re-medical care for the injury of this case, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant for the instant injury after obtaining the approval of the Defendant’s medical care for the instant injury.

On October 28, 2011, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a medical treatment plan stating that “In the instant injury and disease, the pain and the radioactive pain have deteriorated after the medical treatment, and the aggravation of the horse escape symptoms No. 5-6-7 in the longitude requires an surgery method when there is no symptoms after the active medical treatment (in the instant case, hospitalization: November 1, 201; November 30, 201; Tongwon: December 1, 201; or February 28, 2012). However, the Defendant issued a non-approval of the medical treatment plan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) with respect to the Plaintiff on November 4, 201 after examining the plan.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for re-examination with the Defendant on November 18, 201, but was dismissed on January 11, 2012. On February 24, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a request for re-examination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on February 24, 2012, but was dismissed on April 17, 2012.

【In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 2 (including Serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiff's main point of argument is that the plaintiff's medical treatment of this case has been caused by light of conical pains and radiations after the medical treatment of this case, and that additional medical treatment is required due to the aggravation of light-6-7 side escape from the light of the trend. In the absence of any symptoms

Nevertheless, it is unlawful that the Defendant rendered the instant disposition that did not approve the medical treatment plan for the Plaintiff by determining that the medical treatment for the instant injury and disease was terminated.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

recognized.

arrow