The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, such as the statement by H, I, and J of the gist of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) and the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the Defendants are sufficiently aware of the fact that the Defendants sold melted with melting and promoting the Defendants, such as “Cresh and Man-Mad-Ma.

This was traded with consumers by informing false or exaggerated facts, and it was advertised that there is efficacy in the prevention and treatment of diseases with respect to food nutrition labelling, etc., and it was advertised that there is a possibility of misunderstanding that non-pharmaceutical drugs have medical efficacy, etc., but the judgment of the court below acquitted the facts charged.

2. The lower court duly admitted the evidence and recorded the following circumstances, namely, the Defendants, at the date, time, and place indicated in the facts charged (hereinafter “instant publicity center”) in which the Defendants recorded a recording as to melting.

Of the recorded contents at the time, there was no part stating that the Defendants were “a melting the body of the Defendants,” but there was no part stating that the Defendants were “A dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty and dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty dynasty.” This part of the facts charged cannot be ruled out.