The judgment below

The guilty part against Defendant A, B, C, D, E, H, and J shall be reversed, respectively.

Defendant

A, B, C, D, E, H, and J.

1. The court below ruled that among the facts charged in this case, the violation of the Political Parties Act against Defendant A, B, D, and E and the violation of the State Public Officials Act due to each party admission, Defendant C, F, G, I, and K, each violation of the Political Parties Act against Defendant C, G, I, and K, each violation of the State Public Officials Act against Defendant H, and each violation of the State Public Officials Act against the State Public Officials Act against Defendant H, the statute of limitations against the violation of the Political Parties Act against Defendant J was imposed. The court dismissed the prosecution on the grounds that the violation of the Political Parties Act against Defendant J and the violation of the State Public Officials Act against the State Public Officials Act against Defendant A, B, D, E, and J, each violation of the Political Funds Act against each political fund contribution, each of the violation of the State Public Officials Act against Defendant C, F, H, H, I, D, and K, each of the charges against each of the Defendant A, B, C, D, and H, and each of the charges was suspended.

The Defendants appealed from the judgment of the court below on the ground of mistake of facts and unreasonable sentencing as to the guilty portion among the judgment below, and the prosecutor entirely appealed the scope of appeal against the Defendants on the ground of unfair sentencing, and on the grounds of unfair sentencing as to each of the conviction parts against the Defendants, the Defendants appealed from the judgment of the court of first instance on the ground of misapprehension of the legal principles as to each of the acquittal parts or dismissal parts against the Defendants. On the date of the trial of the court of first instance, the Defendants alleged mistake of facts, and the prosecutor withdrawn each of the misapprehension of the legal principles as to each of the acquittal parts or dismissal parts against the Defendants. Even if both appeals are accepted, the result of the judgment of the court below does not affect

Therefore, this Court.