logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2019.07.25 2019고단249
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 28, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju metropolitan District Court's support on July 27, 2006; on April 27, 2011, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act; and on December 19, 2013, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On June 7, 2019, at around 20:50, the Defendant proceeded one-lane road in front of the Korea Land Information Corporation, located in 90 South-Namnam-gun, Namnam-do, Namnam-do, Seoul-do, at an aesthetic speed from the side of the C market to D.

At the time, there are nights, and there are many signal-based vehicles, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to thoroughly operate the steering direction and brakes to prevent accidents by accurately operating and safely operating the steering direction and brakes in the front-time and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the part behind the FF truck driven driven by the victim E (year 41) who is in the atmosphere of the signal while under the influence of alcohol level 0.145%, due to the negligence of being driven by the Defendant while under the influence of alcohol level 0.145%, in front of the driver’s seat of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as salt panions in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, brain-dead sugars in an open two parts.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) driving a rocketing car in the state of alcohol alcohol level of 0.145% from the date and time limit set forth in paragraph 1, from the front of the H restaurant located in the Southern Navy G to the place set forth in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E.

arrow