A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2016, at around 23:45, the Defendant was informed of C’s her intention to her her her her her her her her her her her her own at the time of his/her her her her her her own her own her own her her own her own her own her own her

Accordingly, the defendant took a bath to the above E who is breathing violence, and assaulted his chest with two descendants three times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers' reports and prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and C;

1. Investigation Report - Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes concerning obstruction of performance;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant assaulted a police officer as above and obstructed the performance of his official duties, and the nature of such crime is not weak.

However, considering the facts that the defendant is against the defendant, there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine, the defendant's age, health, occupation, character and conduct, family relation, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records, etc., the punishment of the same kind as the order shall be determined.