(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.10.21 2020고정212

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.10.21 2020고정212

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a B apartment security guard at the time of leisure, and the victim C (the age of 72) is a resident of the above apartment.

At around 18:40 on February 4, 2020, the Defendant pointed out that the victim was not a working method for the said apartment security guards in front of the said apartment complex integrated guard room, and carried out a bath theory by hand on the ground that the victim was not a working method for the said apartment security guards.

As a result, the Defendant suffered salt ties and tensions that require medical treatment for about two weeks to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A three-dimensional statement;

1. Reports on internal investigation (or investigation by the other party of the staff of the management office), internal investigation reports (or investigation by CCTVs), and investigation reports (where a medical certificate is attached);

1. Application of CCTV images (the rehabilitation of the first trial date)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the date of the instant case is that the victim, who is an apartment resident, becomes a dispute in the process of filing a civil petition, and according to CCTV images, etc., according to CCTV images, etc., the defendant can confirm whether the defendant was off his/her son and clothes while the victim raised his/her son and the victim raised his/her arbitrity and brought about a dispute. In light of the situation before and after this, there are some circumstances considering the motive and circumstances of the instant crime, considering that the defendant was sufficiently divided in the process of responding to the victim’s civil petition, resulting in

It also constitutes a favorable sentencing factor that the injury suffered by the victim is minor.

However, even if these favorable factors of sentencing are fully considered, it is not appropriate to sentence a fine of 500,000 won in the summary order in light of the sentencing precedents in similar cases, and therefore, the sentence against the defendant shall be determined like the order.

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.06.03 2016고정583

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.17 2017고단1048

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2020.01.22 2019고정101

-울산지방법원 2014.03.27 2014고정73

-광주지방법원 2017.03.24 2016고단4427