1. 피고는 원고에게 별지1 목록 기재 부동산 중 별지2 도면표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을...

1. Facts of recognition;

가. C은 2011. 2. 28. 피고와 사이에 D주식회사 소유의 별지1 부동산(이하, ‘이 사건 점포’라 한다) 중 별지2 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내의 (가)부분 약 5㎡(이하, ‘이 사건 부동산’이라 한다)에 관하여 피고에게 차임 월 120만 원, 임대차기간 2011. 2. 28.부터 2013. 2. 27.까지로 정하여 전대하는 내용의 계약(이하, ‘이 사건 전대계약’이라 한다)을 체결하였다.

In the instant sub-lease contract, the seller agreed that “if the seller takes the time limit of five months for the sale, the lessee shall set the store at the time of the sale.”

B. On July 28, 2015, the Defendant, while receiving the instant real estate and engaging in the retail business with the trade name of E, drafted a letter stating “C,” stating, “I, on July 30, 2017, promise to make E-Operation B will be cut off at a close price (hereinafter “instant letter,” and “instant agreement”).

C. C (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) died on December 5, 2016, and the Plaintiff, as an son, succeeded solely to the rights and obligations of the deceased regarding the instant real estate through an agreement on the division of inherited property.

[Ground of recognition] The descriptions of Gap 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, Eul 1 and 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. As long as a request for extradition based on a special agreement of the Defendant under the instant sub-lease agreement is citing a request for extradition under the instant sub-lease agreement, a separate determination is not made.

According to the above facts, the time limit ( July 30, 2017) set in the letter of this case has expired, and the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff according to the agreement of this case, barring special circumstances.

B. The defendant's assertion and judgment (1) the condition of the instant agreement is attached.