logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.02.03 2020고정845
공유수면관리및매립에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by each fine of five million won.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act;

(a) In order to store goods within a green area, control area, or natural environment conservation area of land for at least one month, any person, including Defendant A (1) garbage storage, shall obtain permission from the competent authority, and shall also obtain permission to change matters permitted for development activities, if such change is made;

Although the Defendant obtained permission for the purpose of temporarily piling up a scrap metal in the area of 2,962 square meters in Cheongju-si, Seo-gu, Seoul and D, the Defendant stored materials (construction vehicles, other waste, etc.) for other purposes than the purpose of development activities without obtaining permission from the competent Gu office from December 23, 2019 to February 21, 2020, the Defendant continued to store other materials (construction vehicles, other waste, etc.) without obtaining permission from the competent Gu office in Cheongju-si, Seo-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, with no permission from the competent Gu office.

(2) A competent authority may order a person who conducts development activities without obtaining permission for development activities in violation of an order to reinstate, or conducts development activities differently from the details of permission, to reinstate land, and a person who violates an order to reinstate.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to comply with an order to reinstate the goods loaded in the Nowon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, D, and E three times from January 15, 2020 to February 13, 2020 by the head of the Cheongju-si, who received an order from the head of the Cheongju-si to correct the piling-up of the goods located in the Cheongju-si C, D, and E, without justifiable grounds.

B. Defendant B, as described in paragraph (1) of this Article, Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, did not obtain permission for development activities and permission for change in the Defendant’s business, and did not comply with the order for restitution.

2. Violation of the Act on the Management and Reclamation of Public Waters;

A. Defendant A (1) Occupys and uses public waters owned and used without permission.

arrow