A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operated a business related to trade in nuclear teams around 2002. However, around springing around August 2005, the Defendant sent back to the creditors due to bankruptcy. From around August 2005, the Defendant was employed in C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) and was in charge of ordering as the head of the export business division, but the above economic difficulties were not likely to be improved, as the above orders were ordered in C, the Defendant was provided with the most most of the above financial difficulties, and then was provided with the order, and then, the Defendant was able to escape abroad after raising a flight fund by selling the flight fund at the half price, and the Defendant introduced the “F” of the victim E’s “F” in the Seogu-gu, Seogu., and was provided with the delivery of the damage group.

On August 31, 2005, the Defendant sent the “written request for production processing” as indicated in the order to the mother company’s transmission, while falsely speaking, the Defendant sent the “written request for production processing” as indicated in the text to the c office located on the second floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan G G G building, to the end of the fast time to pay 30% of the down payment to the victim via phone, “hympiri (Hi Liulririririririririririririring)” 262,50 gate (market price of approximately 204,750,000) to the color processing company.

그러나 사실은 피고인은 피해 자로부터 원단을 제공받더라도 이를 절반 값에 판매하는 이른바 땡 처리 후 해외로 도주할 생각이었으므로 그 대금을 지급할 의사나 능력이 없었다.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) provided the victim with KRW 204,75,875 on September 22, 2005; (c) 82,659 on September 29, 2005; (d) 42,327 gates on September 30, 2005; (d) 5,907 gates on October 2, 2005; and (e) 46,779 gates of KRW 204,750,000 on the aggregate of the market price of the original supply to the Defendant as the delivery company designated by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against H and I;

1. Application of the police statement law to E.