logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.09.02 2013고단529
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 14, 2013, Defendant A, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) around 07:00 on the ground that Defendant A, at the E main point in Ischeon-si, performed drinking together with the victim F (23 years of age) and G (23 years of age) on the ground that he was able to prevent the victims’ age while drinking drinking together with the victim F (23 years of age) and B (23 years of age), and instead, Defendant B, the victims of this case, was able to bring the victims into a mixed way.

Defendant

A around 07:25 on May 14, 2013, around 07:07:25, the victim F was cut down in the future of the above E main entrance, and Defendant B, as drinking, her face of the above F at one time, her head debt, her head debt, and Defendant A her face and body part of the above F due to drinking and her hair, and Defendant A continued to her mari from the horses of the above F, and continued to her face with the face of drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim F and G.

2. On May 14, 2013, at around 07:55, the Defendants of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) expressed that, as seen above, the Defendants were removed from EM Hacheon Police Station He was sent to the said F and G after receiving 112 reports in front of the main entrance of EM; (b) Defendant A expressed that the said police officers “I interfered with the flasing, Ip flap?,” and expressed that “I’s face and part of the above I’s face, and part of the I’s flab to flap?,” and continued to walk the bridge part of the said JJ, which was sent to a flagrant offender, such as assault, and Defendant B said that “I flab flab flab flab flab flab fe fe flaf f.” to the said police officers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above I and J and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the second trial date)

1. Each police statement concerning F, G, I, J, K, and L;

1. Each statement of M and N.

arrow