A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From March 1, 2008 to November 16, 201, the Defendant was sentenced on February 1, 2012 by the Gwangju District Court to a suspension of execution of four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents, etc., and was finally decided on February 9, 2012 by the Secretary General of the D University, who was in charge of administrative affairs necessary for the operation of D University, such as school expenses and finance and accounting of EM and EM, and EM.

1. Occupational embezzlement and violation of the Private School Act (Death on June 9, 2013) mean a person who served as the president of a DNA University affiliated with a school foundation E-AF from March 1, 200 to February 5, 2010.

No income belonging to the accounts of school expenses shall be transferred or lent to other accounts.

Nevertheless, F had the Defendant and G, the director of the accounting division, paid the public relations expenses for the recruitment of students at the D University in the year of 2010, and ordered the payment of the income belonging to the accounts for the tuition of D University to be deposited into the accounts of the faculty members and returned in cash.

On November 18, 2009, the Defendant and G drafted a written resolution of expenditure with false content as follows: (a) the Defendant paid 3 million won to H of teaching staff, 1.5 million won to I of teaching staff, 500,000 won to G of teaching staff, and 500,000 won to G of teaching staff under the direction above.

The Defendant and G arbitrarily delivered KRW 5,50,000,000 to the school expense account on the basis of the above disbursement resolution, and delivered it to the said F in cash, and used it individually, and at the same time transferred the revenue belonging to the school expense account to the said F in addition, from November 29, 2010 to November 29, 2010, arbitrarily delivered KRW 58,50,000 to the F in total seven times as shown in the attached crime list 1, and simultaneously transferred the revenue belonging to the school expense account as shown in the attached Table 1 or 3 until January 21, 2010.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspireds with F and G as above.