1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. On February 5, 2018, the Defendant deposited KRW KRW 338, which was the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong Housing Site Costs in 2018.

1. The reasons for this part of the facts of recognition are as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the partial dismissal as follows. Thus, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The second to fourth of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed by the following:

“2) The mother land of the instant case was destroyed by the 625 War, and the cadastral area was destroyed by Pyeongtaek-si Yuri (hereinafter “Yuri”) around September 1954.

(3) According to the land cadastre of E, E, 40 square meters (720 square meters) of E, 2,380 square meters (720 square meters), which was combined with G, H, I, and J land on November 30, 1954, and the said E, 2,380 square meters of land was divided into nine parcels, including 40 square meters or F, 319 square meters, and the cadastral records were restored (including where the land number is not attached; hereinafter the same shall apply).

(A) On the other hand, the closed register (No. 11, No. 12.4) of E was registered on June 20, 1935, and Q, N, AO, and AP land was divided on May 20, 196, and the E return 40 square meters remains. On June 20, 1935, the registration of initial ownership of L was completed on March 14, 1947, after the registration of initial ownership was completed on February 20, 194, and after the registration of initial ownership was completed on February 1, 200, the land owner of QU was registered on May 20, 196, and the former land owner of QU was transferred on May 15, 197, the former land owner of QU was registered on March 14, 194, and the former land owner of QU was transferred on May 17, 197.

(No. 11). 6 E.