logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.22 2016고단2594
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 24, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million with a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of road traffic laws at the Seoul Western District Court on July 24, 2013, and a summary order of KRW 3 million with a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of road traffic laws at the Seoul Northern District Court on January 27, 2014.

On April 4, 2016, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.085% during blood transfusion, the Defendant driven a B camping car from the “Umsan Electronic Commercial Building” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front road of the “Macheon 16-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul to the two-lane unification.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the provisions on prohibition of vehicle operation under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the said provisions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The circumstantial report of the driver employed at the main place;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and applicable Acts and subordinate statutes concerning reporting and management;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (including the facts that seem to be contradictory to others) of the mitigated amount;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the foregoing reasons are considered);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

arrow