Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
In fact, the ownership and lease sale of the instant real estate jointly owned the instant land A, 11,410.2 square meters and its ground commercial buildings (hereinafter “instant land,” and the building “instant commercial building,” combined,” the “instant real estate”), which is an affiliate company of the World Group (the final change of the trade name after several times, and regardless of whether it was before or after the change of the trade name; hereinafter “KDDD”) and the Simn (hereinafter “KDDD”) Co., Ltd. (the last change of the trade name after several times; hereinafter “KDDD”). However, among the instant commercial buildings, there were co-owned shares of the instant land 93,82.19/123,79, 210.79, 29, 29, 30/123, 210, 200, 30/10.79, 30/10,000 shares of each of the instant land.
KAWD classified the instant commercial building into the name of “Gu unit” according to its area location, and leased 3,261 unit units to 2,661 lessees (hereinafter “former lessees”) for the total amount of KRW 194.5 billion, and opened commercial buildings in the name of “C” around September 1996.
After the CLessee's Union Committee (former name: DLessee's Union Committee; hereinafter referred to as the "former Committee") was not paid in around 1998, the former lessee made a contract for the purpose of returning lease deposit, etc. on May 18, 1998.
In order to secure the claim for the refund of the deposit, the Madyp demanded the macro-group to establish a provisional registration of the instant real estate and to transfer the right to manage and operate the instant commercial building. On September 23, 1998, the said demand was partially accepted, and 7/10 of the instant land owned by Kdyn&D and 93,82.19/123, 210.79 shares (hereinafter “instant co-ownership”).