All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Summary of Reasons for appeal

A. Defendant 1) Defendant 1 did not commit an indecent act against the victim as stated in the instant facts charged, and even if the Defendant’s grandchildren did not her her mare near the victim.

Even if the defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts and misunderstanding the facts in the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court (2 million won in penalty, 40 hours in order to complete the course) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court determined that the Defendant’s act constitutes “indecent act” under Article 298 of the Criminal Act, and that the Defendant’s act could be acknowledged as having committed an intentional indecent act by force against the Defendant.

The decision was determined.

① Recognizing that the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

② In the Defendant’s side, the Defendant was found to the effect that he did not have the intention of committing an indecent act on the ground that he was found to have been guilty of having committed an indecent act because he was in the state of drinking, and thus, he did not have any intention to commit an indecent act on the ground that he was shotly going back to the hands or need to unsatise his body due to misappropriation.