Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 15:43 on October 27, 2020, the Defendant paid a male trial expense in front of the “C D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D, called “sat for returning home, satfs, sats,” which the Defendant sent to the police officer one time in two hands, and the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report of 112 case by assaulting the above E E E’s chest that continued to stop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement in F of the suspect interrogation protocol to the defendant, the place where the defendant will work for the police police officer's testimony protocol to E, copies of police officer's evidence, and the closure of a 112 reported case handling campaign in the 112 reported case processing schedule, and a photographic investigation report (the confirmation of fyp image)

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136(1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties), and the selection of fines (the crime of this case is committed by the Defendant, with the remaining 112 reported by the Defendant, and with the two police officers dispatched by the Defendant, the nature of the crime is poor in light of the circumstances and result of the crime.

Since the defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 300,000 for the crime of bodily injury in 2008, there is a risk of recidivism.

다만 피고인이 이 사건 범행을 모두 자백하고 깊이 반성하고 있는 점, 피고인이 경찰관들에게 행사한 유형력의 정도는 경미한 편인 점, 피고인은 이 사건 범행 직전 상처( 喪妻) 하고 크게 상심한 상태에서 과음을 하다가 이 사건 범행을 하게 된 것이라고 주장하고 있는데, 피해 경찰관들은 피고인의 이러한 상황을 이해하면서 피고인에 대한 처벌을 원치 않는 점, 피고인은 2014년 이후 형사처벌을 받은 바 없는 점 등을 참작하여 벌금형으로 처벌하고 벌금 액수를 정한다)

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.