logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.06.22 2014나3366
채무불이행 및 불법행위로 인한 손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, in addition to the dismissal or addition of the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of the first instance, the reasoning of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. A part concerning addition or height;

A. In the third class 9 of that part, “A clan” in the first class 9 of that part, “the plaintiff is still pending in the court on August 21, 2014,” and “the defendant clan’s claim of the defendant clan is pending as of the date of the closing of argument in this case” among the 9th class No. 10 of that part No. 4, “the plaintiff’s testimony of the witness I, J, and the witness AB,” and “the defendant clan is pending in the court on August 21, 2014, and the defendant clan appealed and is currently pending in the court of Daejeon District Court 2014Na13417,” and the defendant clan’s testimony in the fourth class 7 of that part 7, “only the witness I, and the witness I, and the witness of the court of first instance,” and each of the 14th class 9 of that case’s provisional disposition or the provisional disposition of this case’s 14th class 7th class 2 of that case’s lawsuit is presumed to be without fault or negligence.

B. In addition, “15 to 17 evidence” was added to “18 to 17 evidence” as of the 7th 6th 6th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 15 to add “18 to 24 evidence”.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is without merit.

arrow