beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant, among May 2013, entered into a business agreement between the victim C and the Defendant, a police officer, to operate the “E” camera in Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, and to divide profits by half. Accordingly, the Defendant and the victim made an initial investment equal to approximately KRW 6,00-70 million, respectively, and the Defendant and the victim began to operate the Kabook directly after filing a business report in the name of the victim’s wife F.
In the meantime, the defendant should transfer the car page because it is difficult to continue to operate the car page because of the fact that the F is pregnant at around May 2014.
“To hear the horses of the victim,” the victim “to purchase Ekbook by the G while in the inside.”
In addition, if sold to that person, the sales amount was KRW 120 million to KRW 150 million to KRW 100 million to KRW 150 million.
If N.N. first takes over a carpet's business license within three months, it will receive the purchase price of KRW 120 million from KRW 150 million to settle the accounts of KRW 50 million invested by N.N.
“A false representation was made.”
However, the Defendant: (a) around that time, when the Defendant was liable for 100 million won to G, and the interest was urged by G to repay the debt, the Defendant agreed to substitute for the payment of 100 million won to G transfer of the said carbook; and (b) there was no agreement with G to receive additional 100 million won in return for the exemption of the said KRW 100 million monetary debt from G; (c) therefore, the Defendant thought that the victim would be able to pay his personal debt to G by getting the victim transferred his/her business license to G; (d) even if the victim transferred his/her business license, he/she did not have any intent or ability to return the amount of 50 million won in return for the investment of the victimized party by receiving the money in the name of the purchase price from the transferee of the car page within three months.
Defendant E. around May 2014, 2014.