1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On April 9, 2013, the Plaintiff first entered the Republic of Korea as a pure tourism (C-3 and the period of sojourn one month) sojourn status, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on July 8, 2013, on July 8, 2013.

On January 16, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition to deny refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have “a well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 12, 2014, but was dismissed on September 30, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 2, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the legitimacy of the disposition of this case is asserted by the plaintiff as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate, the plaintiff's assertion is met with the mother of the village from the Cordidididila South Gano (Gagnoa) area, and the plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's Ba B (B; hereinafter "B") was threatened with murder from residents of the village and the plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's right at the time of establishment of the B government. The plaintiff's plaintiff'

The plaintiff was subject to intimidation that the victim's body will be dangerous due to the anti-military support activities conducted by the police officer in the middle and high schools.

In addition, cotdididivia discriminates against those who have moved to Hazkna, etc., and the plaintiff's reference is from Hazknapha.

As such, even though there is a risk that the Plaintiff would be stuffed on the grounds of political opinion or race when the Plaintiff returned to the Republic of Korea, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee. The instant disposition is unlawful.

This Act, Article 2 (Definition of Refugee Act) of the Refugee Act, is applicable.